Dr. Oz sets Oprah and Michael J. Fox straight on stem cells and Parkinson’s

2009 April 24
by Bob Waters
Herein Oprah’s Dr. Oz explains to Herself and Michael J. Fox why the patient’s own skin cells, rather than embroyos, are the best bet for providing the stem cells which will provide a cure for Parkinson’s and other illnesses perhaps within the next decade.

And here M.Z. Hemingway- to whom a hat-tip for the above- comments.

Haven’t heard much about this in the media, have you?

HT also to the Reverend Christopher Esget.

Why they’re "progressives" now, instead of "liberals"

2009 April 24
by Bob Waters


I’ve noticed a fascinating phenomenon in my on-line conversation with lib… er, progressives: their seeming conviction that to disagree with them, or to suggest that their rhetoric is irresponsible or ill-advised, is somehow to attempt to deny them their freedom of speech.

An equally fascinating phenomenon is their conviction that conservatives have no right to free speech whatsoever.

Maybe that’s why they don’t want to be called “liberals” anymore.

HT: Real Clear Politics

The One is on the cover of TIME. Again.

2009 April 24
by Bob Waters


This is the seventeenth week of 2009.

Barack Obama has been on the cover of TIME magazine for thirteen of them.

He’s there again this week.

This is getting a little ridiculous. The One is no more newsworthy than any other president. But love is a powerful motivator- and the media are in love with Barack Obama.

HT: Drudge

Lay off Miss California!

2009 April 24
by Bob Waters

I don’t always agree with CNN’s Roland Martin. But this reaction to the firestorm about Miss California in the Miss USA pagent having given a response to a question on gay “marriage” which reflects the viewpoint of a clear majority of Americans is right on the money.

HT: Real Clear Politics

Saturn is a knockout

2009 April 23
by Bob Waters


Here are some really spectacular closeup views of Saturn, its rings, and its moons from Cassini.

A sample is on the right.

HT: Drudge

HAWKS WIN AGAIN! Up 2-0 over the Flames!

2009 April 19
by Bob Waters

Iowa porkulus

2009 April 19
by Bob Waters


In case you’re wondering, here is where some of President Obama’s bacon-flavored “stimulus” money is being spent in Iowa.

Information concerning the number of jobs to be created by the spending is provided.

Nothing like good, tasty Iowa pork.

Susan Boyle redux

2009 April 17
by Bob Waters

YouTube has disabled embedding, so I wasn’t able to include a video in my previous post on Susan Boyle. But- Yahoo! Video to the rescue!

In case you’ve been on Mars and haven’t seen it, here’s the 47 year-old Scotswoman instantly becoming one of the cultural icons of the Western World:

I will never hear this song again without thinking of Susan. She’s taken this beautiful song right away from Fantine!

HAWKS WIN!

2009 April 17
by Bob Waters


YES!!!

Marty Havlat ties it in the third, and wins it twelve seconds into overtime!

ADDENDUM:

The game winner:

Was ist das?

2009 April 17
by Bob Waters

President Obama, Georgetown University, and the monogram of Jesus

2009 April 17
by Bob Waters


It was problematic enough for faithful Catholics that Georgetown University had invited pro-abortion on demand, pro-fetal stem cell cannibalization President Barack Obama to speak there. But once there, White House staff requested that the monogram- IHS- actually ιης, the first three letters in ιησους (the name “Jesus” in Greek)- which is engraven on a pediment of the stage where the president was to speak be covered up.

A triangle of black painted plywood accomplished this.

The White House claims that concealing the monogram per se was not their intention. Rather, they wanted to provide a suitable background to the appropriate flags. It was seen as “disrespectful” to have a Christian symbol displayed behind a president making a policy speech.

Judge for yourself from the photos whether the monogram- which is located behind the black plywood triangle- would have been problematic.

Georgetown is a Catholic university. No president would have any right to ask that Christian symbols be concealed from a stage there on which he had agreed to speak. If the monogram would have created a problem in displaying the appropriate backdrop, that might be a different matter. But it was a dicey request, given the circumstances- and a case can be made that maybe the flags could have been displayed in some other way rather than giving what our Catholic brethren and sistren might refer to as the occasion of scandal.

Of course, the president’s staff might say that such was exactly their intention.

HT: Drudge

The governor of Texas really ought to know better

2009 April 17
by Bob Waters


It seems that even Texas Gov. Rick Perry believes the urban legend that the treaty by which the Republic of Texas was annexed to the United States granted Texas the right to secede.

Snopes.com deals with that much-circulated whopper in the last paragraph of this article.

That the treaty contained no such provision can be readily seen by simply reading it. Its full text is here.

The Wikipedia article on the annexation of Texas to the United States says this:

A popular urban legend has grown stating that Texas has a special right to secede from The Union. A thorough reading of all documents for annexation shows that no provision is made for Texas to secede from the United States.Texas has the same rights granted to it as any other state, but also the right to form from its territory 4 states in addition to “Texas”, essentially creating 5 states. Furthermore, in its 1868 decision in Texas v. White, the United States Supreme Court ruled that secession of Texas from the United States was illegal. The court wrote, “The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States.”

Here is the text of the Ordinance of Annexation approved by Texas.

Here is the Joint Resolution of Congress annexing Texas to the Union.

But no matter how many times the facts are pointed out, the silly legend that Texas has a right to secede established by legal treaty continues to bounce around the internet. If the treaty in question had contained such a provision, the United States never would have signed it.

HT: Drudge

Go Hawks!

2009 April 17
by Bob Waters


My Blackhawks make their first Stanley Cup playoff appearance since the 2001-2002 season tonight, facing off as favorites against the Calgary Flames.

Here’s hoping for a deep playoff run in this second season of the New Era.

Three cheers for Susan Boyle!

2009 April 16
by Bob Waters

Too bad they disabled embedding at You Tube.

I watched this over and over… and not just because I love the song. This lady rocks!

They don’t call it the bronchial tree for nothing!

2009 April 16
by Bob Waters


A 28 year old Russian man, Artyom Sidorkin, apparently inhaled a fir tree seed at some point. There is no other explanation- other than Photo Shop and some doctors who want attention very, very badly.

Sidorkin developed severe pain in his chest. Surgeons removed most of his lung, expecting to find a tumor- and instead found a small tree growing in it.

Reminds me of that Allan Sherman song from the ‘Sixties, I See Bones:


The doctor was looking at the X-ray
And I asked him, “What do you see?”
And he kept on looking at the X-ray
As he said in French to me:

“I see bones.
I see gizzards and bones,
And a few kidney stones
Among the lovely bones.

I see hips
And fourteen paper clips,
Three asparagus tips
Among the lovely bones.

I see things in your peritoneum
That belong in the British Museum.

I see your spine,
And your spine looks divine.
It’s exactly like mine.
Now doesn’t that seem strange.
And in case you use pay telephones
There’s two dollars in change,
Among your lovely bones.


Could this be the origin of the Coneheads?

It should be noted that some of the commenters at a Russian site reporting the story are skeptical.

HT: Drudge

Sarkozy reportedly sees The One as weak, meek, and insubstantial

2009 April 16
by Bob Waters


Well, the reviews are in from the French on The One’s European tour.

Nicholas Sarkozy and company are apparently not impressed. The French president apparently sees the American president as weak, unoriginal, unassertive, and full of hot air.

Mr. Obama is the one who, if you recall, was supposed to restore our reputation and relationship with the cheese eaters and other European types.

Image by א (Aleph), http://commons.wikimedia.org

HT: Drudge

Staff infection

2009 April 16
by Bob Waters


Apparently the House gym has been contaminated with antibiotic-resistant staphlococcus. It’s being disinfected after a staffer (who is apparently recovering, having been simply warned against using the gym again until the drainage has stopped) caught the scary staph infection that eats the stuff used to treat it.

I’d pun further on “staph” and “staff,” but this is no laughing matter.

HT: Drudge

Peeps give some of us the creeps

2009 April 14
by Bob Waters


Since the high school I graduated from is in Chicago, and since I could care less about the Iowa Hawkeyes (unless they’re playing Northwestern or Illinois), and since my allegiance to Iowa State is pretty much due to the fact that you’re a Cyclone fan by default if you live in Iowa and do not root for the Hawkeyes, I seldom watch local sports programs. But I saw an item on one of then last night which captured my interest. Sort of.

It seems that the crew at this particular station is notorious for eating anything that is left out in the break room- including, on one memorable occasion, salted sugar cookies. But the host left out a box of Peeps yesterday in honor of Easter.

There were no takers.

It appears that I am not the only one who is not a Peeps person.

Just who is guilty of ‘hate speech’ here?

2009 April 13
by Bob Waters


Herein former Polk County GOP Chair Ted Sporer reflects on the hate speech Iowa’s legislative left wingers (specifically extremist House Speaker Pat Murphy) are using to demonize those who don’t think the same way they do about gay “marriage.”

This is standard moonbat operating procedure, of course. You don’t have to engage the opposition in debate if you simply call them enough nasty names- a technique the Party of the Jackass has long since mastered. After all, why think when you can slander?

‘He is risen. He is here.’

2009 April 12
by Bob Waters


And he said to them, “Do not be alarmed. You seek Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified. He has risen; he is not here. See the place where they laid him. –Mark 16:6

But as I told the congregation at St. Mary this morning:


He is risen. He is here- in the Word and in the Sacrament, sharing His victory over death with us…. I have yet to hear of anybody receiving Holy Communion from a caddy, hearing a good sermon preached by a walleye, or receiving Holy Absolution from a blue jay. A cardinal, maybe- but not a blue jay.

Jesus is God, and God is present everywhere, including golf courses and the great outdoors. But only here is He present to share with us His victory over death. Only here does He give us not merely information about Himself, but Himself; only hear does He give us not instructions on how to survive death, but His own resurrection life.

We do not need information about Him, or even from Him. Our plight us much more serious than that. The only thing that can save us from this body of death is Jesus Himself- and because He is risen, He is here.


May you share regularly in the antidote for death- the Word of the Gospel and the Blessed Sacrament- that you may share in his resurrection life.

Fenton Communications and the left-wing disinformation machine

2009 April 12
by Bob Waters

The huge percentage of journalists- both broadcast and print- whose views tilt strongly Left is well documented. Though the Left denies it, so is the overwhelming bias which asserts itself in their coverage of the news.

Little known, however, is the role of Fenton Communications, a left-wing propaganda machine which is responsible for intentionally promoting a goodly percentage deal of the disinformation which misleads the American people on the issues of the day.

Rowan Scarborough of Human Events explores its activities here.

HT: Real Clear Politics

Surely he has borne our griefs…

2009 April 11
by Bob Waters


Isaiah 53 (English Standard Version)


Who has believed what he has heard from us?
And to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?
For he grew up before him like a young plant,
and like a root out of dry ground;
he had no form or majesty that we should look at him,
and no beauty that we should desire him.
He was despised and rejected by men;
a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief;
and as one from whom men hide their faces
he was despised, and we esteemed him not.

Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
But he was wounded for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his stripes we are healed.
All we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned—every one—to his own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.

He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,
yet he opened not his mouth;
like a lamb that is led to the slaughter,
and like a sheep that before its shearers is silent,
so he opened not his mouth.
By oppression and judgment he was taken away;
and as for his generation, who considered
that he was cut off out of the land of the living,
stricken for the transgression of my people?
And they made his grave with the wicked
and with a rich man in his death,
although he had done no violence,
and there was no deceit in his mouth.

Yet it was the will of the LORD to crush him;
he has put him to grief;
when his soul makes an offering for guilt,
he shall see his offspring; he shall prolong his days;
the will of the LORD shall prosper in his hand. Out of the anguish of his soul he shall see and be satisfied; by his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant,
make many to be accounted righteous,
and he shall bear their iniquities.
Therefore I will divide him a portion with the many,
and he shall divide the spoil with the strong,
because he poured out his soul to death
and was numbered with the transgressors;
yet he bore the sin of many,
and makes intercession for the transgressors.


A post from a previous year on the reason why Good Friday, and not Easter or Christmas, is the most important day of the church year can be found here.

This….

2009 April 9
by Bob Waters

…is positively post-modern:

Love that rabbi!

Religion isn’t the issue

2009 April 9
by Bob Waters

During my senior year in high school- 1968- a great deal of national attention was charmingly given a college student (I forget which college, but it was a major one) who was the subject of disciplinary action by the dean for moving in with her boyfriend. In retrospect it seems incredible that any dean would even notice such a thing in 1968. But apparently there was sufficient recall of the common sense behind the “Ozzie and Harriet” family constellation of the ’50’s for this to be the case. Even the national news magazines covered the story. It was used as an object lesson by Pastor Sedory in our high school Doctrine class.

Now- despite the refusal of some few clergy (like yours truly) to perform weddings for couples who are doing so- most of us tend to assume that couples will live together before getting married- that is, if they even bother get married at all. And this despite the evidence of survey after survey that living together before marriage, far from reducing the chance of divorce, approximately doubles it.

But we’re even past that now. Nearly forty percent of American babies are born out of wedlock- and raised by struggling, impoverished single mothers oblivious to the wisdom of the parable of the cow and the free milk given to he who has yet to purchase it.

Admittedly, traditional Christianity opposes premarital sex, to say nothing of pre-marital parenthood. Doubtless this is one of the issues (abortion and passive euthanasia being two others) which Newsweek’s Jon Meacham has in mind when he suggests in this article that “evangelicals” want to impose their religious beliefs on others. It’s a common perception on the cultural Left, one which gives rise to all sorts of unrealistic and even bizarre fears of a coming theocracy in America. Of course, the cultural liberals who fear such a thing miss the same point the essentially Calvinist cultural conservatives who really believe that public policy should, ipso facto, be made to conform to Christian doctrine seem to miss: that in a democracy, unless a majority of the voters subscribe to a particular religious belief, to advocate a policy on religious grounds alone is inherently self-defeating. Nobody votes to enact into law somebody else’s religious convictions!

Hence, to argue for any public policy on solely religious grounds is not only harmless (from the point of view of religious pluralism), but stupid (from the point of view of cultural conservatism). But again, neither liberals nor Calvinist “Evangelicals” (nor Arminian ones with a Calvinist doctrine on the role of the state) have quite caught on to this rather- excuse the expression- fundamental point.

It’s not merely unbiblical to have a baby before you’re married. Nor is it merely a bad idea personally, dooming one as it does to a miserable and impoverished existence for at least long enough to get the kid out of the house or (less than likely) find a guy willing to pay to help raise another man’s child. It’s not merely harmful to the child for him or for her to grow up in a household without adult models of both genders to relate to (despite the propaganda of the advocates of same sex “marriage,” the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates increased difficulties as adults in relating to people of the opposite sex among children who grow up without a parent of that sex in the home).

It’s bad public policy not to discourage this. It harms the fabric of society to have nearly forty percent of our kids growing up in such circumstances- just as, for example, it harms us all when Roe v. Wade creates a class of living members of species Homo sapiens who are not persons before the law, and whose lives are not sacred. True enough, the line at which members of our species become persons can theoretically be drawn at many places. But conception is the only line that will not move the moment personal convenience or fashion dictates that it move, and which does not avoid carving in stone the premise that something more than humanity itself is necessary to be a person.

President Obama made a much-baleyhood speech on the subject of the relationship between religious belief and public policy a few years ago. I responded to it here. And in another post, I’ve pointed out why Mr. Obama was right (at least to a point), and Baptist luminary Dr. Al Mohler wrong, in a public exchange they had over the issue.

I don’t think Mr. Obama fully recognizes that opposition to abortion, gay “marriage,” passive euthanasia and even the attitude the culture takes toward premarital parenthood can be questions of public policy which, while they may be prompted by religious beliefs, are not in themselves inherently religious. They are matters of public policy, which can be debated on purely secular grounds- on grounds of public policy.

To Mr. Obama’s credit, the main thrust of his argument was precisely that, to the degree that “religious” matters of that kind can be cast in secular terms, they are completely legitimate matters for public debate. Mohler opposed making those arguments in such terms; Obama, as I said, didn’t seem to recognize the degree to which they can readily be made in practice, as well as in theory.

But they need to be made. They need to be made precisely in secular terms. It isn’t merely the souls of parents and the lives of children that are at risk when nearly forty percent of our children are born out of wedlock, when the state sanctions an essentially dangerous practice like homosexual behavior, or when either the unborn or those who cannot speak for themselves but have potential inheritors who stand to profit from their deaths can be killed for the sake of other people’s convenience. Society is harmed, and the harm need not be described in sectarian terms.It can be quantified and demonstrated and used as arguments with the potential to persuade intelligent people of all religious backgrounds, and none.

And it should be. No, it must be. No longer can any of us afford for the secular Left to be allowed to get away with defining such issues as sectarian, and thus avoiding the necessity of addressing them on the merits.

And this is where it leads

2009 April 9
by Bob Waters

A Turkish anchor reports a story on our president- in blackface.

One has to be neither a Democrat nor a Republican, a liberal or a conservative, or a supporter or a critic of Mr. Obama to be outraged at this. It is not merely a tasteless, racist insult to Mr. Obama. It is an insult to America.

But it does show how much some of those to whom Mr. Obama wants to make nice-nice respect us- and him- as a result.

HT: Drudge